The Old
Lady of the Avenue has a bad case of heartburn.
A group
of tenants at the Old Lady, a nickname for the venerable
Kennedy-Warren apartment building in Northwest Washington,
has gone on strike, refusing to pay a $233 monthly renovation
surcharge that went into effect at the first of the year.
It is the first large-scale rent strike of its kind in the
city, officials said.
The tenants
at the art deco building, next to the National Zoo on Connecticut
Avenue, contend that its owner, Bethesda-based B.F. Saul Co.,
is gutting the building's character, gouging tenants for renovation
costs and violating rent control laws.
"They've
made it clear that the people who live here now are not welcome,"
said Peter
Schwartz vice president of the Kennedy-Warren Residents'
Association. Representatives of the company did not return
calls seeking comment.
The dispute
involves the future of one of Washington's most famous addresses,
a building once home to Lyndon B. Johnson and his wife, Lady
Bird, before they moved to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. The property,
named for original owners Edgar S. Kennedy and Monroe Warren
Sr., opened in 1931 and is on the National Register of Historic
Places.
The building
has a historic wing and a tower that opened in 2004. The tenant
association is fighting to keep some units in the old wing
moderately priced; the tower is not subject to rent control,
and rents there range from $2,500 to more than $8,000. Many
of those units are rented as corporate apartments, tenants
said.
"There's
often a perception that Connecticut Avenue people have oodles
of money," said Schwartz, 29, who works for the Federal
Railroad Administration and lives in the historic wing. "But
a lot of people who live here are mid-level workers or people
on fixed incomes. Historically, the rents have been pretty
moderate."
Only
105 of the original 372 units in the historic wing are occupied.
Many residents accepted incentive deals from the landlord
to move out before the renovations, and vacated apartments
were not leased again.
Schwartz
said that the building will still look Art Deco on the outside
but that the apartments will lose features of their original
character, including custom door knockers, forced-air vents
over the doorways and milk shafts attached to kitchens where
milkmen used to leave dairy products from the hallway.
"If
you were in New York and you had an untouched prewar building,
it would be a gold mine," he said, tapping a wall in
the apartment of Zina Greene, president of the tenant association.
"This is not drywall over metal studs. This is masonry,
handcrafted plaster. You can't build this again."
B.F.
Saul does not have to keep reconfigured vacant units under
rent control.
The company
is proposing to more than double rents in newly leased units.
A first-floor efficiency that used to go for $1,430 a month
would cost $3,333. Rent for a two-bedroom on the 10th floor
would increase from $3,974 to $8,400, according to a rate
list provided by the tenant association.
"On
the one hand, we want landlords to upkeep a building, but
the question is, should you up their rent and make tenants
pay for vanity bathrooms and granite tops in the kitchen?"
said D.C. Council member Mary M. Cheh (D-Ward
3).
Jim McGrath,
chairman of the D.C. Tenants Advocacy Coalition, said landlords
often use renovation to push tenants out, enabling them to
raise rents after remodeling. Although tenants have the right
to return after renovations are completed, they rarely do,
he said.
"It's
a tactic of the landlord to kill rent control," McGrath
said.
The Kennedy-Warren
tenant association has filed a petition with the D.C. Rental
Accommodations and Conversion Division, which is responsible
for administering rent control laws.
A judge
in the Office of Administrative Hearings is scheduled to review
the dispute Feb. 28.
Like
other tenants who have refused to pay the increase, Greene,
the tenant association president, sends her rent check, without
the surcharge, to a lawyer who deposits it in a city escrow
account, where it is to be held until the matter is resolved.
She was
part of the association in 1996, when it thought it had struck
a deal with B.F. Saul to lock in rental rates in exchange
for tenants' support of the tower's construction. Rent increases
in rent-controlled buildings are capped at the yearly increase
in the cost of living plus two percentage points, and surcharges
for buildingwide capital improvement projects are capped at
20 percent, according to the D.C. Office of the Tenant Advocate.
B.F.
Saul divided its renovation increases into two sums. A $179
monthly surcharge, which by law can last only eight years,
went into effect in June. Some renters refused to pay, but
there was no group effort to strike. That changed when the
second one went into effect.
Greene
said she regrets that the association was not more specific
about its demands in 1996, which included forcing the landlord
to upgrade the electrical and plumbing systems.
"We
were the tool to support them, and then they turned on us,"
said Greene, 70, a retired restaurant owner who has lived
in the building for 24 years.
While
the parties wait for the judge to resolve the dispute, B.F.
Saul is asking tenants to sign an agreement to lock in their
rents without the surcharges in exchange for the ability to
raise rents in the vacated apartments. Under D.C. law, the
landlord needs 70 percent of the tenants to sign for the agreement
to take effect.
Tenants
said the company has told renters that if they don't sign,
they will be subject to larger rent increases. The company
has given residents until Jan. 31 to make a decision, tenants
said.
Joel
Cohn, legislative director for the District's acting chief
tenant advocate, Johanna Shreve, said landlords are increasingly
using such agreements and unfairly putting the burden of capital
improvements and rate increases on future tenants.
"You
can't coerce tenants, but this seems to coerce the tenants,"
Cohn said. "If you vote against the agreement, you're
treated like a vacant unit" and therefore subject to
a larger rent increase.
B.F.
Saul plans to move the remaining tenants around the building
as it renovates a tier at a time, the tenants said. The apartments
will have new floor plans and upgrades consistent with new
buildings in the District.
Ellen
Ruina, 57, who has lived at the Kennedy-Warren since 2004,
said that if she didn't love her ninth-floor apartment so
much, she would have been gone by now.
"I
understand it's a business," she said. "I understand
they need to modernize, but the way they're handling it has
been so unpleasant."